The Rolex Oysterquartz, a watch that boldly defied the brand's traditional commitment to mechanical movements, remains a fascinating chapter in horological history. While the mechanical movements are often lauded for their complexity and craftsmanship, the Oysterquartz, specifically the reference 17014, offers a compelling alternative with its unparalleled accuracy and distinctive design. This review delves into the nuances of the 17014, addressing its strengths and weaknesses, and comparing it to its close relative, the 17013, while also exploring the market realities surrounding its price and potential issues.
The Rolex 17014, a ladies' Datejust Oysterquartz, presents a compelling case for those seeking a blend of precision, elegance, and a slightly less formal approach than its full-gold counterpart, the 17013. My personal experience with the 17014 has revealed a watch that is surprisingly comfortable and easy to wear in daily life. This contrasts significantly with my experience with the 17013, which, while undeniably luxurious, felt noticeably heavier and less adaptable to various situations. The 17013's weight, primarily due to its solid gold construction, proved to be a drawback, particularly the clasp which, I found, frequently caught on clothing, especially women's dresses. This was a frequent annoyance, affecting both comfort and practicality, depending on the wearer's lifestyle and activities. The 17014, often featuring a steel and gold combination, offers a more balanced weight distribution, resulting in a superior wearing experience.
This difference in wearability highlights a key aspect of choosing between these two closely related models. While the 17013 commands a higher price due to its precious metal construction, the 17014 represents a more versatile and arguably more practical option for everyday wear. The choice ultimately hinges on individual priorities: the undeniable prestige of full gold versus the enhanced comfort and practicality of the steel and gold combination.
Comparing the 17014 to its Predecessor: The 17013
The Rolex Oysterquartz 17013, often simply referred to as the "Oysterquartz Datejust," serves as the direct comparison point for the 17014. Both models share the same iconic Oyster case, the reliable and accurate Beta 21 quartz movement, and the instantly recognizable Datejust aesthetic. However, the key differences lie in the materials and, consequently, the overall feel and price.
The 17013, typically crafted entirely from 18k gold (yellow, white, or occasionally pink), presents a distinctly luxurious and opulent appearance. This, of course, comes at a premium. The weight, as mentioned earlier, is a significant factor. The solid gold construction makes it substantially heavier than the 17014, which often boasts a combination of steel and gold, typically 18k gold bezel and center links on the bracelet, with a steel case and outer bracelet links. This difference in material composition translates into a more comfortable wearing experience for the 17014, especially for extended periods.
Rolex Oysterquartz 17013 Problems:
While the Oysterquartz movement is renowned for its accuracy, some potential issues have been reported, although they are not widespread. These are generally related to age and the specific components of the quartz movement itself, rather than inherent design flaws. Problems can include:
current url：https://jwdjxm.szhxtt.com/products/rolex-17014-review-97693